| |
I. Secondary indicator and weight adjustment under "Academic
Reputation"
(Table 1) Secondary indicators' Weight Adjustment under Academic Reputation
| |
Total weighted results of the first round
survey |
Total weighted results of the second round
survey |
The coefficient of correlation
between two rounds |
| ① Number of Authorized Doctorate Conferring
Bases |
22
|
22
|
0.665**
|
| ② Number of Authorized Master Conferring
Bases |
12
|
12
|
0.631**
|
| ③Number of national key subjects |
23
|
23
|
0.753**
|
| ④ Number of National Key Laboratories |
21
|
21
|
0.816**
|
| ⑤ Number of key subject bases of humanities
and social science |
22
|
22
|
0.675**
|
| Total |
100
|
100
|
|
"**" Symbolizes the significance level at 0.01; "*"symbolizes
the significance level at 0.05. In this investigation, the number of experts
responding to both surveys is 29. Checking the significance table, when
n=29, we have P (0.01)=0.471, P (0.05)=0.367, the same with the following.
II. Secondary indicator and weight adjustment under "Student
Performance"
Table2: Secondary indicator adjustment under Student Performance
| |
First round survey weighted result sum |
Second round survey weighted result sum |
The coefficient of correlation
between two survey weighted results |
| Admission selectivity |
35 |
3636 |
0.665** |
| Graduate student/all students Ratio |
36 |
37 |
0.703** |
| Passing rate of National exams (CET4 and
CET6) |
29 |
27 |
0.758** |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
|
III.Secondary indicator and weight adjustment under "Academic Achievement"
|
Secondary indicators
|
Result from direct weight assignment
|
Results from AHP analysis
|
| SCI |
23
|
25
|
| SSCI |
18
|
19
|
| EI |
16
|
17
|
| ISTP |
12
|
13
|
| A&HCI |
11
|
10
|
| Statistics of China Science and Technology
Thesis and Quotation Database |
11
|
9
|
| China Science of Society Quotation Database |
9
|
7
|
| Total |
100
|
100
|
|
|
1999
